Veritasium
Veritasium
Veritasium

An element of truth - videos about science, education, and anything else I find interesting.

Engineering with Origami
18:22
Does Planet 9 Exist?
16:20
Flamethrower vs Aerogel
13:21
World's Lightest Solid!
12:02
Magnetic Micro-Robots
7:42
How Was Video Invented?
13:13
Spinning Black Holes
10:14
The World in UV
11:13
My Life Story
11:41
World's First Car!
9:14
Fire in ZERO-G!!
7:48
The Sun Sneeze Gene
6:17
The Bayesian Trap
10:37
Water on the Moon?
6:04
Welding in Space
6:53
Stringless Yo-Yo!
4:52
Is Glass a Liquid?
7:02
コメント数
  1. Krushn Pathak

    Krushn Pathak4 分 前

    So wrong centrifugal and centripetal forces can never act together

  2. Thiago Sturiale

    Thiago Sturiale12 分 前

    There was a very cool program called chaoscope, that simulates the Lorenzo effect. Very nice. Thanks

  3. Hexproof Anarchist

    Hexproof Anarchist13 分 前

    Yes, the nature of reality is a paradox.

  4. Marvin Kitfox

    Marvin Kitfox16 分 前

    My off-the-cuff take on the questions: 1) Cylinder contains a second cylinder (or even just a ballbearing). The "sloshing" of the inner roller is what upsets the outer. 2) Depends on the gear. Anything from move(drag!) backwards to move forward, depending on how much wheel movement is caused by crank movement. 3) Second lap speed needed to *double* first lap speed? Fast. Very fast. Warp factor Plaid speed. And even then only if your stopwatch is slow. 4) Train: Any part of the wheel that extends past the rolling surface, i.e. the flange on the wheel. (plus anything mechanical int he engine that rotates fast enough...)

  5. Stam Garonda

    Stam Garonda25 分 前

    The process of detecting is dificult to understand. There should be animation to help us to undersand it

  6. Nathan Seery

    Nathan Seery39 分 前

    He's back! This episode reminded me of your older videos <3

  7. JP

    JP40 分 前

    What seems like common sense to a genius is revolutionary to us commoners.

  8. ProfWildcard

    ProfWildcard42 分 前

    Unless you’re talking about climate change. That future can be predicted with certainty beyond scientific discussion.

  9. Abhinav Is

    Abhinav Is42 分 前

    How do we know which particles are entangled

  10. John Riley

    John Riley51 分 前

    Between 4:16 and 4:29 (at 0.25x speed, of course), look to the left half of the chain to understand the phenomenon. This is because the beads on the right side bunch up to make it look like two interlocking parts of the chain to offer a distorted perspective. You'll waste a lot of time if you look to that side. Just FYI.

  11. Chelment Christie

    Chelment Christie時間 前

    Can we make art with aerogel ?

  12. CAMINOonPC

    CAMINOonPC時間 前

    Artificial intelligence solved the tree body problem

  13. Michael Wilson

    Michael Wilson時間 前

    Nope boredom or boring people come on human race 😛😝😜🤪

  14. Bingo Bango

    Bingo Bango時間 前

    What do solar batteries do in zero gravity?

  15. Poeung Coco

    Poeung Coco時間 前

    This is the first channel that deserve my 'Ring the bell'.

  16. Sylvain

    Sylvain時間 前

    Funny how much "simple" experiments can teach you a lot ! Thank you :)

  17. GMMVNET

    GMMVNET時間 前

    All the people just watched the video and voted

  18. Joakim Posten

    Joakim Posten時間 前

    Shoutout to grandpa for helping you 😂😂

  19. heba585

    heba585時間 前

    Thank you for this comprehensive video please continue on this series .

  20. Jonathan

    Jonathan時間 前

    What if someone hacks your LastPass?

  21. Momo Mittens

    Momo Mittens時間 前

    1 - can't be bothered to test which liquid it is, but it's a liquid 2 - surely it depends how hard you pull the string, how grippy the tyres are, how heavy the bike is... 3 - I would assume (1+3)/2 = 2 means you'd have to go 3 times faster, but I'm expecting I'm wrong 4 - the wheels, I reckon this was the easiest

  22. lutfi dandy

    lutfi dandy時間 前

    this is the greatest life story i've ever watched

  23. Melwin Mathew John

    Melwin Mathew John2 時間 前

    This is beyond science

  24. Follow Media

    Follow Media2 時間 前

    8:47 it's technically misleading to say it's under 1atm of gauge pressure upon uncapping, but rather only 4E-4 atm. because in this case only the partial pressure of CO2 in the atmosphere is relevant. opening a soda bottle into our atmosphere is as good as opening the bottle into outer space where the drink going flat from CO2 loss is concerned. you can confirm this by opening the bottle, recapping it, pumping atmopheric air into the headspace back to 3atm, then shaking the bottle. gauge will rise to 6atm despite the dissolved CO2 being only 3atm.

  25. Johann Alyosha Van Tassel

    Johann Alyosha Van Tassel2 時間 前

    I clicked this thinking you could actually use it as a table

  26. MLTDS// MLTheDiamondSword

    MLTDS// MLTheDiamondSword2 時間 前

    So I can use this as a fireproof pop filter?

  27. Dr IP

    Dr IP2 時間 前

    0:57 Bruh

  28. Ali yea

    Ali yea2 時間 前

    Oo he's using matlab I use that a bit 😮

  29. Ben Stuttard

    Ben Stuttard2 時間 前

    Origin of the name "Butterfly Effect" is from "A sound of Thunder" by Ray Bradbury (1952), surely? And apologies for calling you Surely.

  30. Wot Wot

    Wot Wot2 時間 前

    Lies repeated often enough becomes the Truth.

  31. Follow Media

    Follow Media2 時間 前

    6:30 should have just Schlieren imaged the melting ice in both cases to compare :)

  32. John aka Chara

    John aka Chara2 時間 前

    999K views? Give him 473 more views please.

  33. Heblo

    Heblo2 時間 前

    I head to the comment section instantly to see if anyone else was confused

  34. hongrui Li

    hongrui Li2 時間 前

    If you read YiJing , a very old Chinese book, and have mastered its essence, your understanding of the world and everything you’ve learned will be overthrown. Two weeks ago, my wife let a Shifu, who is a master of YiJing read about her life. He asked her for some information like her birthday, birth place and so on. After a few minutes, that Shifu asked my wife if her dad had already passed away. My wife was like shocked cuz it is true that her dad died three years ago....after this experience, I changed my mind and attitude of YiJing and what a Shifu does. I used to think all those stuff are superstitious, but now....

  35. Madhu Soodan Shukla

    Madhu Soodan Shukla2 時間 前

    Yes he was correct.

  36. Nathan Hazout

    Nathan Hazout2 時間 前

    Can you clarify? Does it mean it is impossible to predict, or very hard with today's technology? Going back to the theory of a system that knows everything, and assuming a future computer that can compute to infinite precision. Would we then be able to predict even chaotic events?

  37. steve Paul

    steve Paul2 時間 前

    This is the first convincing "thing" I have ever seen on the possibility of climate change. A very good case was made however I do believe the role of water vapor was down played. Also the cause of climate change was blamed on a small amount of Carbon Dioxide. The cutting of the rain forest is playing a bigger role in changing of the climate. The rain forest produces water vapor and reduces Carbon Dioxide.. NOT addressed in this presentation. IF global warming was real problem we would be looking at alternatives to reduce the temperature of the planet. To fight the ice age there was a plan in the 70's to drop coat dust on the snow in the plains. I am sure it would have worked. Spread some ashes on the snow in your yard sometime and watch the snow melt. If it is getting too hot reflect the suns rays back into space.

  38. Marc Sainte-Marie

    Marc Sainte-Marie2 時間 前

    More falsehood, never ending maistream lies, Newton did not make laws, he was no happy with his 4% math success of Gravity. Einstein showed Newton was wrong about gravity. Now ... www.nbcnews.com › mach › science › einstein-showed-newton-was... Aug 3, 2019 - Albert Einstein can explain a lot, but maybe not black holes. ... there has to be something that is more comprehensive that allows ... The orbits of planets shift over time, and Mercury's orbit shifted faster than Newton predicted. NASA uses Geocentric model to create its predictions. Isaac Newton predicted the world will end in 2060 nypost.com › 2018/09/01 › isaac-newton-predicted-the-world-will-e... Sep 1, 2018 - Isaac Newton was a legendary scientist best known for establishing the ... “He was convinced that the true god is present everywhere, not only in ... some fundamental part of matter that would allow the transformation from ...

  39. Wilson

    Wilson2 時間 前

    👌👌

  40. Madhu Soodan Shukla

    Madhu Soodan Shukla2 時間 前

    1. Its roll with different centre of mass. 2. I think it will go backwards. 3. Infinite ( there a formula that) 4. I have no Idea. I am from India. I have not seen the solved video. I am doing Engineering in IIT-D. Lol my studies did not help in the last ques. Edit( after watching the solved video) : 1. ans was correct. 2 I should have said it depends as I knew about Torque. 3. I actually solved it in 15 sec. 4. I didn't knew train had grails in them. I just thought that the bottom point is stationary.

  41. Lorne Malvo

    Lorne Malvo3 時間 前

    Promoting services like LastPass with many exploits is dangerous. Unsubscribed

  42. Rose White

    Rose White3 時間 前

    bottle geysers for the same reason boiler explosions are so deadly. As soon as a small openiong in bottle or crack in boiler occurs the adjacent compressed liquid can immediately flash into vapour and then the next and the next until a chain reaction of flashing occurs right through the liquid until all the pressure has dropped to atmospheric. With hot water in boilers obviously more of the liquid will flash off. This is the reason why shaking a can of pop then trying to cut it open will cause a mini explosion that rips the can open.

  43. UZIMike !

    UZIMike !3 時間 前

    Kilometers per hour?

  44. Ninja Claus

    Ninja Claus3 時間 前

    This is the video where your Australian accent is strongest

  45. Laman Digital

    Laman Digital3 時間 前

    Fewer view doesn't mean less quality..as a youtuber..i hate that.

  46. Sesto Sili

    Sesto Sili3 時間 前

    LIGHT WEIGHT BABYYY!!!

  47. Nick Venture

    Nick Venture3 時間 前

    Does the view of a black hole always look the same no matter your orientation bc of how it bends light around it? Still trying to wrap my head around a 2d object in a 3d space..

  48. Alan Malcheski

    Alan Malcheski3 時間 前

    you could put magnetos in it and try to run it like an alternator or something. This array seems to utilize the natural magnetic flow by compounding the fields, it uses the natural toroidal dynamic in a type of broken symmetry, i guess. If you're creating heat you're wasting energy. Couldn't it take up the energy it gives off, if it alternated current? I still don't understand wireless energy transfer.

  49. Marcelo Zerbini

    Marcelo Zerbini3 時間 前

    I've just finished reading Jurassic Park yesterday!

  50. FuXed

    FuXed4 時間 前

    The redback will only give you as a normal healthy person pain different places of your body. No spider bites are designed to kill humans. What kills you is infection and allergy!

  51. sachin vs

    sachin vs4 時間 前

    I thought I had dandruff, but it was scalp psoriasis

  52. Rene Schickbauer

    Rene Schickbauer4 時間 前

    Veritasium: I read sometimes things like "this moon was probably a small planet captured my this giant planet". I may missunderstand the slingshot effect, but wouldn't this result in retrograde orbit? If the flyby was prograde, wouldn't this accelerate the object out of orbit?

  53. Fuzzy Gaming

    Fuzzy Gaming4 時間 前

    8:20 Funny how we can't predict the weather 7 days from now, but we can supposedly predict the climate 7 decades from now...

  54. RANGERHOOD

    RANGERHOOD4 時間 前

    Was it painfull?

  55. Another Penguin

    Another Penguin4 時間 前

    Nobody: Not a soul: Bag of potato chips: This dude, 4 in the morning: MARY HAD A LITTLE LAMB A LITTLE LAMB

  56. neomt2

    neomt24 時間 前

    He got a rich house

  57. TheStefanSchramm

    TheStefanSchramm5 時間 前

    Awesome video! Fractales please!

  58. Lina Rosma

    Lina Rosma5 時間 前

    3:08 why i'am laughing

  59. Thomas Klitgaard

    Thomas Klitgaard5 時間 前

    Hey Veritasium :) What happens when you freeze a coke and let it heat up again. why does the coke expand when it freezes and why is there gas still inside it?

  60. Mightylal

    Mightylal5 時間 前

    Thank God I understand physics and am able to appreciate this type of content....

  61. sebastian Sabaza

    sebastian Sabaza5 時間 前

    This is asombrous eclipse total 21/08/2017 who was ocurred than the hour?

  62. Schwurbel

    Schwurbel5 時間 前

    Is it really just the rough surface of a Mentos? A kind of porous but ohter wise non-reactive ceramic would work as well?

  63. T Barr

    T Barr5 時間 前

    found my own answer! moon is 1.3 seconds back! BUT Mars is 20 minutes!! So the Mars Rover is able to see us..the earth.. 20 minites into THE FUTURE!!! WTF? Sooooo what are they doing with THAT SECRET INFO??

  64. Wot Wot

    Wot Wot5 時間 前

    Wow, this is how science should be explained.

  65. CHANAKYA SINHA

    CHANAKYA SINHA5 時間 前

    Watch professor eric laithwait videos

  66. Kirk Hermary

    Kirk Hermary5 時間 前

    I'm not sure why you don't know how wingnuts work but you could have just Googled it. It shouldn't be that hard to get your head around.

  67. Jonathan Pasagui

    Jonathan Pasagui6 時間 前

    We are but pendulums swinging so slowly to our final demise

  68. akash kallai

    akash kallai6 時間 前

    4 sound

  69. RAJ SINGH

    RAJ SINGH6 時間 前

    EINSTEIN 🙏🙏🙏🙏

  70. Reynald Roxas

    Reynald Roxas6 時間 前

    I really love science

  71. Robert James G

    Robert James G6 時間 前

    Who else flipped their phone lol

  72. sockington1

    sockington16 時間 前

    to answer the video title - no. next rubbish video please

  73. Cameron Daugherty

    Cameron Daugherty7 時間 前

    This video is bananas

  74. Akshat Rastogi

    Akshat Rastogi7 時間 前

    Great work ...!!!

  75. alphabeets

    alphabeets7 時間 前

    The CIA and military probably had this perfected decades ago.

  76. Aleksandar Ivanov

    Aleksandar Ivanov7 時間 前

    What is this video about?

  77. Smurf U

    Smurf U7 時間 前

    Second law of thermodynamics?

  78. DO IT

    DO IT7 時間 前

    Shot Noise: Hope that I'll CNot.

  79. Abdul Rehman

    Abdul Rehman7 時間 前

    "Pluto formally known as planet",. Best way to insult a not so planet !!!?!!!

  80. Salty Guy

    Salty Guy7 時間 前

    finally. I can use it as my heatsink so i won’t use water tubing again :)

  81. Ivan Se Hoo

    Ivan Se Hoo7 時間 前

    I keep coming back to this video to teach physics to my students

  82. Wolfie Aurora

    Wolfie Aurora8 時間 前

    Sooooo *Read More*

  83. Cam L

    Cam L8 時間 前

    1)molasses 2)backwards if your pulling hard or doesn’t move if pulled lightly 3)3x as fast 4)the thing in the wheels

  84. Trym Bruset

    Trym Bruset8 時間 前

    V: The goal is to prove Feynman wrong. Me: Heh.. About time *upvote* V, 2 seconds later: *mentions Terrence Tao* Me: WHY CAN I NOT UPVOTE A VIDEO TWICE

  85. Perry Knew Em

    Perry Knew Em8 時間 前

    He lost me...

  86. uzielperez2002

    uzielperez20028 時間 前

    For some reason I did 13 * 47 in my head instead. But hey I got it right. 611

  87. Gourav Tada

    Gourav Tada8 時間 前

    Anyone from 12th class?

  88. - MathieuMan -

    - MathieuMan -8 時間 前

    A. center of mass isn't in the middle B. Forward C. More than you would think D. A part of the wheels of the train

  89. Ryugo7 7

    Ryugo7 78 時間 前

    Who dis nigga is?

  90. Adam Azra

    Adam Azra8 時間 前

    This is absolutely cool. Period.

  91. Poeung Coco

    Poeung Coco8 時間 前

    Even phone is boring for me because I don't use phone that much. I'm more like less bored on my laptop.

  92. uzielperez2002

    uzielperez20028 時間 前

    8:37 but how does Drew decide whether it's reasonable or not? :O

  93. Samantha de Regules

    Samantha de Regules9 時間 前

    The sound of the ring sliding down the necklace in slow-mo is orgasmic

  94. CoolFire666

    CoolFire6669 時間 前

    So is the system deterministic but the problem is that we don't have sufficient resolution (yet) to predict the behavior of chaotic systems, or is it that we would need infinitely fine resolution for such a prediction and thus it can't ever be done? And if so, would it not be theoretically possible to get close enough that the error is no longer a significant factor compared to the lifetime of the universe?

  95. Dominic Vladica

    Dominic Vladica9 時間 前

    Do you even butterfly?

  96. Andrey Khazhevskiy

    Andrey Khazhevskiy9 時間 前

    Traveling at light speed time stops. So yes, it is possible at light speed

  97. Zachary Bowman

    Zachary Bowman9 時間 前

    this further confirms my belief in infinite realities because at every instance, no event that occurs after that instance can possibly be identical to another, thus each different trajectory after every moment creates a whole new reality that goes its own path.

  98. Anand Saxena

    Anand Saxena9 時間 前

    The popularity of the Butterfly Effect is proof that most people barely understand statistics and probability. 🤦🏾‍♂️

  99. Karthik Prabhu

    Karthik Prabhu9 時間 前

    1:47 This where i thought it is numbers of ascending order

  100. ashok kumar chinta

    ashok kumar chinta9 時間 前

    may i knoaw the place, i live in vancouver