Swatch Sistem 51 - HONEST review (HR & EN captions)

To buy this watch on Amazon and help the channel click here:
Using the above link and purchasing ANYTHING on Amazon gives a little donation to the channel without any additional cost for you, so THANK YOU to all you guys who donate that way!!
This week we take a look at the praised Swatch Sistem 51 after 2 years of wear and you will get an honest review of a watch that nobody dared question, when it was first introduced.
If you would like to help the channel going, or feel VERY grateful for the info you got, you can donate by clicking here:
Or become a Patron:


  1. pantherv5

    pantherv58 ヶ月 前

    I, unfortunately, own a failed Sistem 51 watch. It sat in my watch box longer than on my wrist as I wear different watches all the time. If i have to estimate, I probably wore this watch continuously for about 8~12 months. I discovered one day that it had stopped working. I tried contacting Swatch but they refused to deal with me as it is out of warranty. I'm very disappointed with this watch. This is the only failed mechanical watch in my decent mechanical watch collection. If you're a potential buyer and you're reading this, stay far away from Sistem 51. It is a total waste of money. You're better off getting a Seiko 5, an Invicta with Japanese movement, or an Orient, which also use their in-house movement. I own a few other Swatch Irony with automatic movements. They all seem to work fine. However, I'm done with Swatch after the Sistem 51 experience.

  2. Cobalt Jester

    Cobalt Jester12 日 前

    It cost you less that $200. Did you really think you were buying quality? They're designed to be quirky, disposable, accessories to your outfit. Not a quality time piece... I can't believe you didn't know this...

  3. Alessandro Cerioli

    Alessandro Cerioli5 ヶ月 前

    Hard to believe as they come with a 2 years warranty and a lot of people got a replacement during warranty.

  4. Dunecigar

    Dunecigar11 時間 前

    Too big, too expensive for what it is, and I can't really find a style that I like.

  5. Cobalt Jester

    Cobalt Jester12 日 前

    Why would you even bother to review such a cheap watch? Reviews only matter on quality items. Quality costs money. No one buys a watch for $200 and thinks it will be good. Well, idiots do....

  6. Polash Adhikari

    Polash Adhikari12 日 前

    What a fantastic review. The fact that you cannot repair it and just have to dump it. The 3 year review from Singapore shows how the watch just stops working :

  7. Eckehardt krieger

    Eckehardt krieger13 日 前

    I have the Sistem 51 irony. Stainless steel case. The metal case became available in late 2016. These ironies you can replace the unit. Hermetically sealed movements are not that new and robotic or automaton assembly is not that new either.

  8. daniel thompson

    daniel thompson16 日 前

    What makes it really interesting is its the first mechanical watch to be fully assembled by robots, that's cool for me just accept its also throw away.

  9. David Bouldin

    David Bouldin17 日 前

    I wasn't willing to spend $150-$200 either. Found one brand new for

  10. hazar rageh

    hazar rageh29 日 前

    Goood watch👌👌

  11. Abhijeet Singh

    Abhijeet Singhヶ月 前

    Thanks buddy, you provide the exact info I am looking for

  12. MichaelAChang

    MichaelAChangヶ月 前

    It's a modern interpretation of the TIMEX mechanical watch from the 60s which was also unserviceable, except the TIMEX was $10 ($89 today, inflation adjusted). You can buy one hell of a Chinese watch for $200, or better yet, a Vostok for $50.

  13. Nolin Chitnis

    Nolin Chitnisヶ月 前

    Buy a Chinese automatic instead of this Swiss crap. At 100 bucks you will get a fairly decent watch that lasts a few years.

  14. Emanuel

    Emanuelヶ月 前

    I came here, because some ''watch expect'' told me about how good these watches are because they have 90 hour power reserve and their ''special and innovative'' mechanism are keeping -+10 sec a day and I had to look this up, because if a 120$ watch have all of that and if it's that good then I must be a complete idiot for spending hundreds of $ on watches that have less power reserve and have the same accuracy and in some cases a little bit worst. Like they say, if it's too good to be true...... Awesome review, I hope it helps others like me that were interested in this watch.

  15. SolderDude

    SolderDudeヶ月 前

    Or this way. Moron buys watch DESIGNED to be a cheap throwaway. Moron complains when it breaks and can't be repaired 😂😂

  16. Sand king 3 Gaming

    Sand king 3 Gamingヶ月 前

    My dad bought me one of these and he expects it to last a really long time and work well. I kinda feel worried now.

  17. Esmond Yeo

    Esmond Yeoヶ月 前

    mine broke after less than a year, and the movement was terribly loud

  18. Sa'ad Suleman

    Sa'ad Suleman2 ヶ月 前

    Thank you for your honest review!!!

  19. SuperLordofwar

    SuperLordofwar2 ヶ月 前

    I Swatch i Timex su to radili sa dosta starih "jeftinih" modela zadovoljstvo ih je bacit' u kantu )) Overpriced junk!

  20. EvenStevens Yo

    EvenStevens Yo2 ヶ月 前

    Loved the video!!! Good laughs, but Soo true!

  21. Johan de Vries

    Johan de Vries2 ヶ月 前

    9-11 usd for a service a Seiko 5?? Thats cheap!!! Im my countrt ( Netherlands) expect to pay at least up to 30 euros!! If you are unlucky the bill could be as high as 50 or 60 euros. Totaly unacceptable for such a watch...but thats the reality. They even charged me 15 euros to shorten a watch strap. Watchmakers here are not cheap!!

  22. Watch Geek

    Watch Geek2 ヶ月 前

    Come to Croatia for a vacation and bring your watches for service 😁

  23. sorin bunea

    sorin bunea2 ヶ月 前

    All your presentation about this watch are true, but I still like this watch ⌚, I have one and I love it

  24. Jas Bataille

    Jas Bataille3 ヶ月 前

    I am extremely disapointed by Swatch as a whole. I remember very well that my dad, who was an avid watch collector back in the days (and still own a few incredible pieces, including a Swiss System-Cartier watch with the rectangular curved dial - good luck finding a crystal for that...!) told me that Swatch was the best watch brand for the money. I really think it was, back in the days. So when I first arrived to New York City, the first thing I did? I got into the Swatch store and bough myself a NY city limited edition Swatch. One of the biggest thing about this particular model is the strap, which features the city's skyline in stunning white ink over the black material of the strap. Which material is probably the cheapest shit I have ever hold in my hands. One of the part of this beautiful custom band, justifying a 30$ increase in the price of the regular model, broke in half. I was sad, but I thought - being a total newbie - that I would have a go at replacing the strap and keep the watch which, after all, was the most important part : a solid timekeeper. Well, guess I was wrong : Swatch is the only watchmaker on the planet with a proprietary strap design, not a Nato nor w tradition two-pieces. So I couldn't replace the strap. I don't know where the fuck the watch is no more. My dad bough me a beautiful Casio with a quartz movement and it's still my daily-driver. Now I tend to shop for watches that are not so well known, such as Manfred Cracco and Martenero (looking at their fantastic new diver which is one of the most beautiful and functional diver I've seen, and it costs less than 400$ with 200m resistance and top notch finishing job through and through, proving again the power of marketing). I also own a chinese Amitron Pro sport instalight. It is one reliable watch. I love the fact you can push a button and the entire dial lit up for a few seconds. It is discreet and actually more luxurious that the big, bold, in-you-face tacky luminescent hands and numerals that you find on a lot of high-end divers. Also, what's up with sizes??! No one have the wrist to wear a 50mm watch for hell's sake. I now buy "women" watches because anything else feels like a portable clock. Having said that, I am still looking for Nautec No limit watches - you know, THE chinese brand which took everyone by storm with their stunningly beautiful and affordable divers? I want one, but seems like they've been shut down by the industry's giants. It sucks. I'll stick to Casio, Citizen eco-drive and Amitron for daily drivers, and Manfred Cracco and Martenero for dress watches. Also I just found a Cartier copy by Guess which looks and performs the same for 20 bucks. The watch industry became one big hoax and that's sad.

  25. Michael Lindenmaier

    Michael Lindenmaier3 ヶ月 前

    I am always trying to tell people, buy a real (s)watch, or even a cheaper model. They might be worth something decades from now, but a fancy smart watch or fitness band will certainly be worthless by then....

  26. TJ

    TJ3 ヶ月 前

    Do not bother with the sistem 51. They look great but the movements are absolute junk. Mine is 3 years old the power reserve is below 10 hours and it sometimes even stops on the wrist. Once it's out of warranty it will start to fail. Piss poor when swatch claimed the movement should last 20 years.

  27. Josko Peric

    Josko Peric4 ヶ月 前

    samo naprid,nastavi tako :)

  28. Vinko Purgar

    Vinko Purgar4 ヶ月 前

    You failed to mention another fact: the three prongs (it is what's these thingies are called?) are difficult to replace. I have an old Tissot with this strap and always have to buy regular straps which the watch service then cuts to provide for these tree prongs ... regular pain in the ass...

  29. Raj Varghese

    Raj Varghese4 ヶ月 前

    i have many a swatch irony quartz watches which i use, some have problems ....i am told that mechanical watches last longer than quartz counterparts...but with swatch sistem 51 watches with non reparable back it is just throw away when it malfunctions that is the biggest fear of owning a swatch ......even though the swatch has mind boggling designs......

  30. styleemusic

    styleemusic4 ヶ月 前

    Man great review, I'm itching to pull the trigger but this made me pump my brakes

  31. Barnaby Bourbon

    Barnaby Bourbon4 ヶ月 前

    Swatch system landfill

  32. Alessandro Cerioli

    Alessandro Cerioli5 ヶ月 前

    The reviewer doesn't understand the simple fact that even if the case can be open the movement cannot be serviced as it's not put together by a screw but all the bridges are laser bonded. Not even the irony is serviceable.

  33. Doggieman1111

    Doggieman11115 ヶ月 前

    42mm is too big for women and smaller guys.

  34. Travis Tan

    Travis Tan5 ヶ月 前

    This review tells the truth

  35. Watch Geek

    Watch Geek5 ヶ月 前

    Thanks 😊, it's my personal opinion, but I'm glad I'm not the only one feeling that way

  36. Douglas Griffiths

    Douglas Griffiths6 ヶ月 前

    My wife collects Swatch watches, but only has those made in the 80s, and some made in the early 90s. One of hers is an Irony automatic that she wears daily, which has an 80s dial (face), a lightning bolt minute hand, and the seconds hand is changed as well. The model that her custom is made from is called Flumotions. The case of it broke when she tried to change the band--that part that holds the band broke. She sent it off to a guy who built her Irony, and it's a great looking watch. She's had it for 7 years now. The Sistem 51 she was not interested in, since it isn't repairable. I was going to get her one for her birthday a couple of years ago. I got her a vintage 80s one that she didn't have. And that one works fine, as all of hers do. She has 47 Swatches.

  37. Reyan Lapitan

    Reyan Lapitan6 ヶ月 前

    Barely used 2 of these watches; winding mechanism breaks; owned both for only 2 years. This is a piece of shit watch.

  38. J S

    J S6 ヶ月 前

    Here are some reasons I, as a non-watch collector or fanatic, bought a system 51. I really hate smart watches - I have too much technology already I love the idea of having a purely mechanic device on my wrist that could keep running for a long time. I love the sound. And I hate replacing batteries in my previous watches. It was such a pain in the ass and watch repairers never would re-seal the watch properly. Meaning Id get moisture in my watches when swimming. It would also cost too much. I love that it's automatic, uncomplicated and sounds nice. If it stops and I have to replace the whole thing outside of warranty, that would be a great time to look for another cool watch :) In other words: it's simple, cheap, fun and a good intro to automatic watches for me :)

  39. 欧阳霖峰

    欧阳霖峰2 日 前

    but ALL mechanical watches do that. You can buy a seiko 5 automatic for less than $100. Not only that, but you can actually CHANGE the straps on the seiko. And it'll come with mineral glass (hardlex) vs the plastic scratch-magnet of the Swatch. Seiko was actually THE japanese company that forced the creation of Swatch by the swiss watch makers.

  40. Supertomiman

    Supertomiman6 ヶ月 前

    Here's the thing, most of the cheaper Seikos are made in Malaysia, the ultimate cost cutting measure. But in spite of that nobody thinks of them as Malayan watches, they're universally regarded as Japanese watches. And as for the ones actually made in Japan, nobody can attest what % of the watch is actually Japanese. That's why the Swiss can't compete with them on level ground.

  41. thundermorphine

    thundermorphine7 ヶ月 前

    Best watch review I've seen.

  42. Watch Geek

    Watch Geek7 ヶ月 前

    Haha thanks 😊👍

  43. castries

    castries7 ヶ月 前

    More swatch reviews wanted

  44. Toby Quach

    Toby Quach7 ヶ月 前

    Yes, it's held together with a single screw (note that the screw does nothing but hold the winding rotor), but keep in mind that the entire movement is riveted together quite poorly. The Sistem51 Irony is not sealed together and can be serviced, but it still has the plastic pallet fork.

  45. Lorraine Rayner

    Lorraine Rayner7 ヶ月 前

    Good review Nothing lasts forever. Expensive watches need expensive maintenace and repair costs Cant see anyine repairing an automatic for 9 bucks. If my 51 lasts 5 yrs i will be happy.

  46. Rauf Abasquliyev

    Rauf Abasquliyev7 ヶ月 前

    Seiko 5 are good watches. But their design is boring. Swatch watches are more attractive.

  47. Caleb Green

    Caleb Green7 ヶ月 前

    Swatch is a affordable quarts watch brand imo. The ones that are $65-125 is the sweet spot for me.. if spend any more you don’t get much back for the money. I like the tick of the quarts they make anyway.

  48. Christianto Sumbung

    Christianto Sumbung8 ヶ月 前

    Buy a seiko. Same money, better watch, and servicable too.

  49. Christianto Sumbung

    Christianto Sumbung8 ヶ月 前

    Buy a seiko. Same money, better watch.

  50. xxmightyonexx

    xxmightyonexx6 ヶ月 前

    Do they make AUTOMATIC watches.

  51. 69johndz

    69johndz8 ヶ月 前

    I have this watch. I purchased it for $120 and...I just don't like it. It feels cheap and I cannot keep it running. It is impossible to read at night. I used to love Swatch and would like to get a couple of vintage pieces. But, when you can get a Seiko 5 for less than $100, I just do not get the point of this watch. I am returning it on Monday.

  52. Harvey Specter

    Harvey Specter8 ヶ月 前

    I would only pay 20-25$ for this watch and its just because of the design.

  53. rain suria

    rain suria9 ヶ月 前

    My first and last swatch was a '1996 Aquachrono swatch watch Red Snapper SBM105 '. It was a gift from a family member. I lost it in 2002 during one of my sea trips when the flex metal/resin band broke, probaby due to age. Its really heartbreaking then. I would not recommend buying a swatch for everyday use especially at sea. I guess my Seiko SKX wins hands down in this situation

  54. AlbertO Contreras Martinez

    AlbertO Contreras Martinez9 ヶ月 前

    🔥excellent review !!!! outstanding 👍

  55. Watch Geek

    Watch Geek9 ヶ月 前

    Thanks 😊

  56. 000 001

    000 0019 ヶ月 前

    If you complain about the cost, then you may as well buy a quartz Swatch. You could even argue that the quartz models look better because they’re thinner. This system51 watch will obviously cost more than other affordable mechanical watches which are assembled from generic parts.

  57. 72duvla

    72duvla9 ヶ月 前

    I personally prefer the look of the most of the Sistem51 to any of the cheaper Seiko or Orient series (Snowflake is not in this league, of course), and don't mind paying a little extra just to have something I like on my hand, but that is up to everyone's taste, isn't it? You did make a great review, but you deliberately trashed the watch from the beginning, forgeting some of the good things about it, it is really more accurate then most cheap Seikos and the 90 hours (in reality more like 70) power reserve is not normally found for 160 euros...

  58. Reynaldo Rios

    Reynaldo Rios9 ヶ月 前

    Probably the best watch review I have ever seen

  59. Watch Geek

    Watch Geek9 ヶ月 前

    Thanks for the kind words 😊

  60. Stefan Lowe

    Stefan Lowe10 ヶ月 前

    This review was awesome! Thanks!

  61. HCP 4

    HCP 410 ヶ月 前

    One screw (unfortunately) is not connecting all the parts .Its is connecting only ONE part - the rottor. Evereting else is glued and capsuleted. There is dissection of the system 51 on the internet, chech it out! Complete scheme or just that they are claming that there is only one screw (wich is technicaly true).

  62. Brad Ovard

    Brad Ovard10 ヶ月 前

    The use of so much plastic is to prevent magnetic buildup. Not purely a cost cutting move.

  63. GardenState2012

    GardenState201211 ヶ月 前

    I will just buy a Casio G Shock or Seiko 5 models within $150 to $200 instead of buying this plastic toy.

  64. 欧阳霖峰

    欧阳霖峰2 日 前

    @Cobalt Jester Gshocks are used by military across the world. Stop being a price snob. Price = / =quality

  65. Cobalt Jester

    Cobalt Jester12 日 前

    Any watch in that price range is a toy....

  66. Yaax Arr

    Yaax Arr11 ヶ月 前

    Well said ! I did terrible buying the one showed and another one! :S I won´t buy those 51 anymore! Thank you !!!

  67. Zainy Zainy

    Zainy Zainy11 ヶ月 前

    well i got a bargain for 40 bucks on carosell brand new

  68. Paulienkham Vaiphei

    Paulienkham Vaiphei11 ヶ月 前

    Brilliant.Precisely how people on either side of the great wall view things.

  69. alex mielnik

    alex mielnik11 ヶ月 前

    According to Lincoln Road 551 in Miami Florida, this watch is now serviceable.

  70. Mike Hayes

    Mike Hayes11 ヶ月 前

    Thank you for showing the cultural bias in your review. I had been eyeing a Sistem 51 when they first came out, but when I saw the permanently sealed case it turned me completely off. I bought a Victorinox Alliance quartz instead which I got for the same price and it has a fully serviceable movement and a sapphire crystal.

  71. k

    k11 ヶ月 前

    A good and more affordable Chinese watch won't do you like this

  72. macaco maco

    macaco maco年 前

    i love this watch. it looks like a childish toy and only weighs in 42 gs unlike those 2-kg seiko divers. i like the fact that sistem 51 is disposable. i like that idea. mine works as a horse. it has lost only 10 seconds in 3 months! incredible accuracy. the ppwer reserve is exellent as well and everything works as it did when i purchased this watch. i love it

  73. FreedomBliss 2012

    FreedomBliss 2012年 前

    Mmmm, the watch that saved the swiss watch industry, automatic movement, cool design, great story, lasts twenty years, 150$. Easy yes there. Buy this one while saving for your “grail” watch.

  74. TJ

    TJ2 ヶ月 前

    Exactly I have the sistem chic it's now 3 years old. I brought one purely out of impulse. When I got to take a closer look I was shocked at the plastic escapement and the fact the balance wheel cannot be regulated as it's done by laser in the factory. Obviously it being sealed would prevent regulation anyway. The single screw holding the entire watch together false by the way. Its actually soldered/welded together the screw holds the rotar on. Cheap crap sold with a huge mark up. I love the quartz swatches and the eta fitted irony models (uncle charly body and soul etc) but these sistem 51s are absolute shite being sold to unsuspecting hipsters.

  75. Watch Geek

    Watch Geek年 前

    Except it dies within 2 years 😄

  76. Manoel Felipe

    Manoel Felipe年 前

    Always remember that Invicta is a Swiss brand too.

  77. Foster Twelvetrees

    Foster Twelvetreesヶ月 前

    Still shit!

  78. Operative 6-12

    Operative 6-1210 ヶ月 前

    Manoel Felipe Not anymore.

  79. Ken H

    Ken H年 前

    You could buy 2 Seiko5 for the money you pay for this non-repairable watch. You will need to service any automatic watch soon or later, idea of "disposable automatic watch" simply sounds non-sense.

  80. Mike Wysko

    Mike Wysko年 前

    With all that plastic it looks like a cheap child's watch.

  81. John the Greek

    John the Greek年 前

    Its NOT wearable. It's fucking massive And 3bars is NOT good for swimming! Swimming needs at least 10bars

  82. Hypercube Extrusion

    Hypercube Extrusion年 前

    god i fucking hate having fun

  83. Lionel Reyes

    Lionel Reyes年 前

    the only "brilliant" thing about the one screw construction is even untrue : wherever screws are usually needed, they are replaced by soldering here. great review btw, great idea to compare 2 different points of view, based on facts.

  84. Watch Geek

    Watch Geek年 前

    Thanks 😊

  85. Juan Luis González B.

    Juan Luis González B.年 前

    The 90 hours of power reserve is a Huge plus compared to the inexpensive automatics that have to be worn daily, or they stop, and the date function has to be reset.

  86. macaco maco

    macaco maco年 前


  87. Sunny Sunny

    Sunny Sunny年 前

    What do you mean that it is a Chinese watch at <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="197">3:17</a>? It is made in Switzerland, so it’s not a Chinese watch get it? And why do you have to bring up the nationality when you are just trying to make the point there are 2 ways of looking at it, one is that it is made with good quality, one it is cheaply made? In fact, you get what you paid for, there is no such thing as poor quality stereotype in Chinese product nowadays, you look at Xiaomi, Huawei, Seagull and Geya, which are just a tip of the iceberg of Company (the later 2 are watch company) owned by China and made in China which are of some of the most superior quality in the world. The point here is you should stop spreading and imposing such biased, false and racist opinion on JPgo community or on anyone.

  88. Watch Geek

    Watch Geek年 前

    You missed the point of the video by such a HUGE margin that any comment is pointless. You might want to rewatch it again to understand what I was trying to say, and that is exactly OPPOSITE of what you are implying

  89. Marc Yaptinchay

    Marc Yaptinchay年 前

    The problem is that a lot of Chinese products have bad QC and some are notorious for cutting so much that it affects functionality . And for a known watch brand like Swatch and with it's reputation will have more stringent QC . Does it cost cut ........yes , just like a Toyota rehashing old tech or platforms but asking modern prices for new cars but in the end is very reliable (basically everyone in more than one way cuts cost). The watch is made to introduce mechanical watches to the younger generation , a generation that is most likely to buy a quartz or smart watch. This watch will help the whole industry and not only the watch brands under the Swatch group. IMHO there will be a time when mechanical watches will enter another crisis as more and more younger buyers buy quartz or smart watches. This watch will either prolong that time or soften the blow in the future.

  90. Marc Yaptinchay

    Marc Yaptinchay年 前

    @Watch Geek Swatch was the watch to have during my time . Don't get me wrong having a sealed disposable watch is weird , but this might not be weird for some as this is more of a starter watch and should not be taken too seriously. Yes quartz has less moving parts and less chances of breaking (like traditional computer hard drives vs static drives) . But for what it is, being sealed is not a problem for me as it is more of a serous toy "like" gadget than a serous watch . Maybe they initially used this design because the repair (if not under warranty) might cost almost as much as a new one. Maybe Swatch realized or have been getting reports of more watches crapping out more than expected and replacing them under warranty is costing them more and is better to leave a caseback for repairs. Will never know what's in the mind of their execs . But putting a caseback will add more problems too as these watches will be bashed around and with the type of watch it is, adding a caseback is adding a fail point for moisture to get in unlike a sealed case . But again i do not know their business so all i can do is guess.

  91. Watch Geek

    Watch Geek年 前

    Quartz swatches are A LOT more reliable than any mechanical watch as quartz simply is, by construction, a lot more reliable, so not being able to open a quartz swatch is ok, but mechanical watches are much more complicated and sensitive and THAT is why a sealed case that can't be open is a bad idea. But there are now models of swatch 51 that come with the screw caseback

  92. Marc Yaptinchay

    Marc Yaptinchay年 前

    @Watch Geek There will always be duds (my high horology watch stopped after a few months, good thing it was under warranty) 2 friends of mine had theirs brought in under warranty too (AP, and a Patek) . Don't these have warranties? If not then that would be a problem and would damage their reputation. I seriously would not get a Chinese watch (the way they do business now). If this was a bet i would put my money on the swiss (because they have more to lose) , and as much as possible at my age i would not want to buy headaches. When my kids get a bit older i will be getting them one of these or a seiko (depends how responsible they are), not as just a gift but also a learning tool as my watches will go to them eventually. If i remember correctly my Swatch could not be opened too ....i think. Just a latch for changing batteries. But this is just me and how i see it.

  93. Watch Geek

    Watch Geek年 前

    The problem is that this is NOT RELIABLE, and unlike a Chinese mechanical watch that CAN get repaired even 20 times in 20 years, this CAN'T. The watch in the video is not even 2 years old and it stops after a few seconds. It might be a simple fix but we'll never know, as you CAN'T open it. This watch is as disposable as a watch can get, but unlike the disposable quartz Swatches, this is not as reliable nor as cheap. If ONLY THEY GAVE IT A CASEBACK THAT CAN OPEN, I would love the watch

  94. 20thCenturyBoy

    20thCenturyBoy年 前

    Great review. Very insightful comparison of Swiss VS China bias towards watches.

  95. Watch Geek

    Watch Geek年 前

    Thanks 😊

  96. Jordan DeLarge

    Jordan DeLarge年 前

    Love the video. For a guy like myself, I just find it very hard to watch an 11 minute video of anything. It’s too bad their cost saving does not save us the customer money

  97. Jeffrey Bowden

    Jeffrey Bowden年 前

    Thanks for the honest review. Cheap and disposable is not how I like to invest.

  98. Joseph Jose

    Joseph Jose年 前

    Wow! You Sir are brave! Kudos for highlighting the biased views on many watch channels!

  99. Watch Geek

    Watch Geek年 前

    Thanks 😊

  100. James Gilmore

    James Gilmore年 前

    Imagine this at $50, a serious no-brainer.

  101. Filip Pecovski

    Filip Pecovski5 ヶ月 前

    actually a 50 to 100$ world wide price would be perfect for this watch. Great for automatic and also a replaceble product when stops working.

  102. Watch Geek

    Watch Geek年 前

    I agree

  103. Abdullah Al-Azmi

    Abdullah Al-Azmi年 前

    As much as I love swatch, there’s no way around it that this idea is brilliantly stupid. Sure, the watch will be permanently sealed which, if not being a lemon, will prevent contaminants. On the other hand, it’s a throwaway mechanical watch... now if one wants a throwaway, would they buy a quartz or mechanical watch? Heck, even a quartz watch can be a heirloom item, because you can FRICKING MAINTAIN THEM!

  104. Abdullah Al-Azmi

    Abdullah Al-Azmi年 前

    That being said, it’s worth investing in a few of them and never use them as a piece of horological history.

  105. watchcode

    watchcode年 前

    I wish this watch was like $80. I like the unique look of it but spending $150-200 on something that to most people looks like a child's toy is just too much.

  106. Leigh Rich

    Leigh Rich年 前

    The dial itself reveals little secrets, in fact on the dial represents the Pleiades star cluster, visible from the constellation Taurus, which counts 51 stars, as well as the movement has only 51 members,

  107. The BMW Backpacker

    The BMW Backpacker年 前

    $150 is too much. This watch should have been priced at $49.95